Supporting papers to 'Local studies of NLC land blocks: Punakitere No.2 and Kohatutaka (1865-present)' (3 volumes), 28 Oct 16
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
Due to its size, this document is not available on our website. If you require a copy, please send your name and postal address (no P.O. boxes) to WT_Requests@justice.govt.nz and a USB will be sent to you.
Northland Block Research Narratives - old land claims (27 volumes), Feb 06
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
Due to its size, this document is not available on our website. If you require a copy, please send your name and postal address (no P.O. boxes) to WT_Requests@justice.govt.nz and a USB will be sent to you.
Index and supporting papers for 'Traditional History Overview of the Mahurangi and Gulf Islands Districts', Mar 10
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
Due to its size, this document is not available on our website. If you require a copy, please send your name and postal address (no P.O. boxes) to WT_Requests@justice.govt.nz and a USB will be sent to you.
Memorandum-Directions of Judge C T Coxhead responding to requests to file claim-specific closing submissions for the Wai 2206 claim and the memorandum from Mr Naden, asking that I reconsider my decision declining a withdrawal of the Wai 1531 claim’s mental health-related issues from stage 2 of the Te Paparahi o Te Raki inquiry, 25 Sept 17
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
Memorandum-Directions of Judge C T Coxhead responding to request for reconsideration of decision to decline the filing of claim-specific closing submissions for the Wai 2206 claim in stage 2 of the Te Paparahi o Te Raki inquiry, 9 Oct 17
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
The Offender Assessment Policies Report
Wai 1024, the Sentencing Assessment Criteria claim
On Monday 10 October 2005, the Waitangi Tribunal released its report on certain policies and procedures used by the Department of Corrections in relation to the assessment of offenders. The Offender Assessment Policies Report considered two specific assessment tools (tests) that were designed and used by the department. The tools helped to identify and assess offenders who were at high risk of reoffending, and were intended to assist the development of programmes that could work towards reducing Māori reoffending.
Claimant Tom Hemopo, on behalf of Ngati Kahungunu, claimed that the assessment tools disadvantaged Maori offenders in terms of the type and length of sentences they received. He also alleged deficiencies in the department's consultation with Māori, and in the design, implementation, and use of the tools.
The Tribunal concluded that there was insufficient evidence to establish that any prejudice had been or was being caused to Māori offenders. The Tribunal recognised that the department had acted in good faith in order to reduce reoffending and believed that some aspects of the assessment tools were ground-breaking.
Nevertheless, it believed that the 'MaCRNs' tool, which focused on Māori offenders' cultural responsiveness, required more testing and independent evaluation. The Tribunal also identified Treaty breaches in the way that the department had developed that tool without consulting Māori communities, and in its monitoring of the tool's use and effects. It considered that Māori communities, including Ngati Kahungunu, had significant interests in the goal of reducing Māori offending and in using Māori culture to help achieve that goal, and the Tribunal thought that the department's responses to Māori reoffending should be developed and monitored in a manner that was consistent with those interests.
In its summing up, the Tribunal said that it believed the parties might not be far apart in finding a way forward that built on the important work that had already been done.
