J Gough (Crown) Crown Memorandum responding to memorandum-directions of the Presiding Officer dated 3 October 2014 and seeking leave to respond to further evidence filed by no later than Friday 24 October 2014, 17 Oct 14
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
Memorandum-directions of the Presiding Officer directing the Crown to file its closing submissions by midday, Tuesday 13 May, and the claimants and interested parties to file their closing submissions by midday, Tuesday 27 May
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
J Gough / A Williams (Crown) Crown Memorandum filing unsworn affidavit of Te Rau Clarke in response to the new matters raised in the affidavit of K Waterreus, 24 Oct 14
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
Draft transcript from Wai 2417 Urgency Hearing held at Pipitea Marae 18-20 March 2014, 22 Apr 14
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
Finalised Transcript for Urgency Hearing, 18, 19 & 20 March 2014, Pipitea Marae, Wellington, 1 Sep 14
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
Clare Matthews answers to questions set out in Memorandum-directions of the Presiding Officer dated 3 April 2014 (Wai 2417, #2.7.2) 5 May 14
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
NZ Maori Council Document Bank - Overview Index for additional evidence placed on the Record of Inquiry, 22 Apr 14
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
Volume 9: Te Puni Kōkiri, Head Office files, part 6, 22 Apr 14
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
Whaia Te Mana Motuhake/In Pursuit of Mana Motuhake: Report on the Māori Community Development Act Claim
Wai 2417, the New Zealand Maori Council Maori Community Development Act Claim
Whaia Te Mana Motuhake/In Pursuit of Mana Motuhake: Report on the Māori Community Development Act Claim, released on 5 December 2014, is the outcome of Wai 2417, a claim brought by the co-chairs of the New Zealand Māori Council and representatives of district Māori councils.
The claim focused on two issues: the Crown’s ongoing review of the Māori Community Development Act 1962 and the Crown’s role in the development and administration of the Māori wardens project, launched in 2007.
The Tribunal held an urgent hearing at Pipitea Marae in Wellington from 18 to 20 March 2014. The panel appointed to hear the claims comprised Deputy Chief Judge Caren Fox (presiding), Ron Crosby, Miriama Evans, Sir Hīrini Moko Mead, and Tania Simpson.
The Māori Community Development Act governs the New Zealand Māori Council, the district Māori councils, and Māori wardens. In 2009, the Minister of Māori Affairs instructed Te Puni Kōkiri / the Ministry of Māori Development to carry out a review of the Act. A report by the Māori Affairs select committee in 2010 recommended changes to the Act but advised that extensive consultation should be carried out with Māori before any proposed reforms were introduced.
In 2013, Te Puni Kōkiri decided to proceed with consultation hui on the 1962 Act, despite the objections of the newly appointed New Zealand Māori Council that it should be allowed to lead the review into its legislation. The Tribunal found that Te Puni Kōkiri’s decision to continue consultations in September 2013 was in contravention of Treaty principles.
The Tribunal also looked at the Crown’s development and administration of the Māori wardens project. The project, launched in 2007, provides funding, training, vehicles, and uniforms to support the voluntary community work of Māori wardens.
Originally, an advisory group and then a governance board provided Māori community oversight of the project, but since early 2011 this critical supervision has been absent. The Tribunal found this lack of provision for Māori community input breached the principles of the Treaty.
The Tribunal recommended that any future review of the Māori Community Development Act be led by Māori – specifically the New Zealand Māori Council – and that all reasonable costs flowing from the review and consultation process should be met by the Crown. Once the council had developed its own proposals for legislative reform and carried out extensive consultation with Māori communities, then it and the Crown should collaborate to reach a negotiated agreement.
The Tribunal further recommended that the Māori wardens project continue but that an interim advisory group or governance board be appointed from among the New Zealand Māori Council and Māori wardens to provide Māori community oversight of the funding, training, and other support delivered under the project.