A commissioned research report by Geoff Park entitled "Effective Exclusion? An Exploratory Overview of Crown Actions and Maori Responses concerning the Indigenous Flora and Fauna, 1912–1983".
Indigenous Flora and Fauna and Cultural Intellectual Property Claim
Further Interim Report on ANZTPA Regime
Indigenous Flora and Fauna and Cultural Intellectual Property Claim
Closing submissions for Ngati Kuri, Ngatiwai and Te Rarawa, 16 Apr 07
Indigenous Flora and Fauna and Cultural Intellectual Property Claim
The Interim Report of the Waitangi Tribunal in Respect of the ANZTPA Regime
Indigenous Flora and Fauna and Cultural Intellectual Property Claim
Cathy Marr, Robin Hodge, and Ben White, Crown Laws, Policies and Practices in relation to Flora and Fauna, 1840-1912, Waitangi Tribunal Publication, 2001
Indigenous Flora and Fauna and Cultural Intellectual Property Claim
Report on Railway Land at Waikanae
Railway Surplus Land Disposal claim
In June 1991, Archie Taiaroa, on behalf of himself and Māori affiliated to the National Māori Congress, lodged a claim with the Waitangi Tribunal concerning the disposal of surplus New Zealand Railways lands. The Tribunal constituted to hear the claim comprised Judge Eddie Durie (presiding), Professor Gordon Orr, and Georgina Te Heuheu, and it reported on four such cases, Auckland, South Auckland, Wellington and Waikenae.
In 1992, the Crown-Congress Joint Working Party proposed a scheme for the disposal of 3605 square metres of surplus Railways lands at Waikanae. In its Report on Railway Land at Waikanae of 21 December 1992, the Tribunal said that, having heard the party, it was satisfied that the only Māori with an interest in the land were the Ruakohatu Urupa Trustees and that the Crown would not be acting contrary to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi in treating with them.
Report on Auckland Railway Lands
Railway Surplus Land Disposal claim
In June 1991, Archie Taiaroa, on behalf of himself and Māori affiliated to the National Māori Congress, lodged a claim with the Waitangi Tribunal concerning the disposal of surplus New Zealand Railways lands. The Tribunal constituted to hear the claim comprised Judge Eddie Durie (presiding), Professor Gordon Orr, and Georgina Te Heuheu, and it reported on four such cases, Auckland, South Auckland, Wellington and Waikenae.
In 1992, the Crown-Congress Joint Working Party proposed a scheme for the disposal of surplus railways lands on Tamaki isthmus, Auckland. In its Report on Auckland Railway Lands of 21 May 1992, the Tribunal was satisfied that Ngāti Whātua, Ngāti Paoa, Ngātitai, and Waiohua had interests in the area and it found that the sale of the lands on the basis of the agreements made would not be contrary to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.
Establishment of Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua
Railway Surplus Land Disposal claim
Report on Wellington Railway Lands
Railway Surplus Land Disposal claim
In June 1991, Archie Taiaroa, on behalf of himself and Māori affiliated to the National Māori Congress, lodged a claim with the Waitangi Tribunal concerning the disposal of surplus New Zealand Railways lands. The Tribunal constituted to hear the claim comprised Judge Eddie Durie (presiding), Professor Gordon Orr, and Georgina Te Heuheu, and it reported on four such cases, Auckland, South Auckland, Wellington and Waikenae.
In 1992, the Crown-Congress Joint Working Party proposed a scheme for the disposal of surplus railways lands from the south coast to Pukerua Bay to Maymorn in the Upper Hutt Valley. In its Report on Wellington Railway Lands of 21 December 1992, the Tribunal found that the Crown would not be acting contrary to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to effect an arragement for the sale of the railway lands to certain named persons and organisations.
