Rapua ngā tuhinga ruku tātari

On Wednesday 22 October 2025, the Waitangi Tribunal  released Ngā Mātāpono/The Principles: Part III of the Report of the Tomokia Ngā Tatau o Matangireia – the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry Panel on the Crown’s Treaty Principles Bill and Treaty Clause Review Policies. Part III completes the report, with the Tribunal’s final chapter (chapter 7).

This report concerns the Crown’s decisions on the Treaty clause review since August 2024. The Tribunal found that, if the Crown proceeds with the Treaty clause review as currently planned, this would breach the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. The Tribunal found that Māori could be prejudiced if the review proceeds in its present form. The potential risks of negative impacts on Māori rights and interests, the Māori–Crown relationship, and the durability of Treaty settlements were all disclosed in the Crown documents provided to the Tribunal. The Tribunal found, however, that it is not too late to refocus the review and its process. The Tribunal said that, if the review focuses on the clarity of Treaty clauses, allowing enough time for robust policy analysis and full engagement with inclusion of Māori in decision-making, the review could be positive and benefit both Māori and the Crown.

The Tribunal noted that there were mixed messages about the purpose of the review. At present, Treaty clauses will have to meet a test in the review that they promote “the fundamental human rights and equality of all New Zealanders and the importance of equality before the law for all in a modern democratic society”. The Tribunal stated that this requirement is already provided for in international and domestic law and is not a principle of the Treaty. It is not based on any policy analysis to justify it, and it breaches the Crown’s Treaty duty to actively protect the rights and interests of Māori.

The Tribunal also found that ensuring clarity of Treaty clauses does not mean repealing those clauses. The current intention to repeal clauses that are considered unnecessary in a review of this particular kind would be inconsistent with the principles of partnership and active protection.

The Tribunal also found that the review as currently planned had been truncated and would leave inadequate time for robust Treaty/te Tiriti policy analysis, engagement with Māori, and involvement of Māori in decision-making. This would be inconsistent with the principle of partnership.

The Tribunal further found that the legal protection of Māori Treaty/te Tiriti rights and interests could be reduced or removed in some key statutes. The Crown was aware that the review could cause “discriminatory outcomes” for Māori. The Tribunal found that such discriminatory outcomes were likely at present and would breach the principle of equity unless changes to the review’s process and scope were made. Moreover, the Tribunal found that the review would breach the principle of redress should the durability of Treaty settlements be undermined.

The Tribunal made several recommendations to the Crown, based on its findings. In summary, the Tribunal recommended that the Crown:

• focus the review on clarity of provisions;
• expand the time for engagement with Māori and involvement of Māori in decision-making;
• take repeals off the table;
• remove the requirement that Treaty clauses must provide for “the promotion of the fundamental human rights and equality of all New Zealanders and the importance of equality before the law for all in a modern democratic society”;
• provide the resources necessary for Māori to participate effectively as demanded in a large-scale review; and
• if amendments or repeals are planned, allow co-design or full reflection of Māori views in decisions, especially in light of the Crown’s partnership obligations and the constitutional dialogue that Treaty clauses represent.